HomeGeneral NewsThe Honey Pot Sensitive Wash Controversy:"I Would Never Make Harmful Products," says...

The Honey Pot Sensitive Wash Controversy:”I Would Never Make Harmful Products,” says Honey Pot founder after backlash over ingredient change.

The Honey Pot Sensitive Wash Controversy: The previous several days have not been easy for The Honey Pot, a respected brand of feminine wellness products. As customers detected a change in the chemicals and branding of the washes, they vented their frustrations on social media. Some assumed the changes indicated the brand had been sold, and Twitter and Instagram rapidly descended into chaos. Beatrice Dixon, the creator of The Honey Pot, is addressing fans’ worries, dispelling misconceptions, and reaffirming the objective of her company, which she claims has not been sold.

“I am spiritually and professionally linked to this brand,” she said in a video message broadcast to social media on Monday evening, addressing three major concerns: ownership, ingredients, and how the brand might have handled the situation.

“My brother, myself, and our staff continue to own The Honey Pot,” she stated. The Honey Pot has not yet been purchased. It’s all a fabrication and gossip. I continue to serve as the company’s owner, CEO, and chief innovation officer. Period. Any other argument is simply false.”

She proceeded by saying that although the components have changed, their safety has not

“Transparency and open communication have always been our commitment to you, so I will be straightforward. Our washing have developed,” she remarked. “We have not sacrificed what counts, which is that our products are plant-based, pH-balanced, and supported by research. I can guarantee you that this recipe is exactly what it was intended to be: safe, attractive, and much more effective.”

Also Read: Who is Alison Hammond Dating? Everything You Need To Know

However, in defending the product, Dixon acknowledged that they could have communicated their adjustments to consumers, whom she refers to as “humans,” and explained why they were necessary so quickly in a better manner.

“We could have spoken more often about the modifications,” she stated.


View this post on Instagram


A post shared by Beatrice Dixon (@iambeadixon)

“We know that we should have communicated with our humans more directly. Honestly, we had intended to implement a modification to our formula much later than we really did. We had planned to share this with you. However, due to the chaos in the global supply chain, we had to speed our preparations.”

They prioritized restocking, but they “didn’t do enough to educate” customers on how the current recipe is more similar than different and why the brand changed. Therefore, she spent a considerable amount of time detailing the chemicals in her washes, declaring, “This is a superior and superior road forward.” As for the removal of “100% natural, zero parabens, and zero dioxides” from the label, this was done since rules regarding the use of such claims have changed.

“This is our reality, not our decision as a company,” she remarked. In spite of this, we do not formulate with parabens, dioxides, or sulfates.

Dixon closed her speech by reiterating the significance of the firm to her, as well as the supporters’ role in helping to grow it. In light of this, she apologized for the communication breakdown.

“I am accountable to you as consumers of our products. You may certainly hold me accountable. “I just want you to know that I’m here for you,” she stated with tears in her eyes. “I am here to be the founder who seeks to effect change in the world I inhabit. And I have no problem responding to you. In actuality, I enjoy it, even when it aches. Please accept our apologies for not sharing this information more clearly. And I kindly beg you to believe me when I tell that I would never create dangerous items or endorse their use. I would be unable of living with myself.”

In addition, the brand’s newsletter contained an additional apology. Despite this, Dixon is aware of the reasons why people are offended and apologizes for it. The Honey Pot has recognized that they might have handled the planned shifts that could have affected their product with greater clarity. In spite of this, I have no urge to further criticize their lack of notification. Where will “humanity” go from here?

Now that everyone has had the opportunity to become agitated online, they may choose to be tolerant and continue to support the company, or they can elect not to. Hopefully, Dixon’s words will dispel the myth that the company is not owned by Black people and that its products are no longer effective (although, what works and is pleasant for each woman’s vagina is a separate topic).

Also Read:Who is Owen Wilson dating? Know About His Relationship

So frequently, when a single error is made by a Black business, the internet conversation shifts from merely concentrating on the error and holding people who operate it accountable to developing a narrative to thoroughly demean them. But if you’ve ever had the opportunity to sit down and speak with Dixon about her products, as I did last summer, you can hear the knowledge she has about the ingredients,

The passion with which she creates these offerings that have flown off the shelves for years, and her desire to be of assistance, whether it be with vaginal irritation, incontinence, or simply emphasizing the significance of a healthy routine to care for your private parts. She is not seeking to grab the money and run, and it is laudable that she could confront people, on camera, and accept criticism while also correcting the record. Many would not comply.

Therefore, The Honey Pot committed an error. But does one communication error negate eight years of effort? I suppose that’s up to “humans” to determine.




Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Recent Posts