HomeControversyHobby Lobby Controversy: The Debate Over the Legality of Hobby Lobby

Hobby Lobby Controversy: The Debate Over the Legality of Hobby Lobby

Hobby Lobby Controversy:The Green family founded Hobby Lobby in Oklahoma City. The Greens were devout Christians who founded Hobby Lobby on biblical principles. The company continues to base its decisions on these principles, including closing stores on Sundays to observe the Sabbath. The company makes an effort to assist its customers. Employees maintain a healthy work-life balance; a full-time hourly employee earns $14.50 per hour, nearly twice the national average. the bare minimum Nonetheless, despite its efforts to maintain an ethical and socially responsible business, Hobby Lobby

Also Read: Vince Mcmahon Controversy: WWE announces Vince McMahon’s retirement amid scandal

Hobby Lobby Controversy

has recently encountered a conflict with the Affordable Care Act, which requires employers with 50 or more employees to provide health insurance. to provide the US Department of Health and Human Services’ definition of minimum essential coverage Theseinclude various types of contraception Hobby Lobby filed a lawsuit against the federal government in 2012. Hobby Lobby already provided its employees with a benefits package.

Contraception is included. However, it discovered that four of these contraceptives were abortifascent, which meant that they could cause abortions. They have the ability to destroy fertilized eggs after fertilization. Because the founders of Hobby Lobby believe that life begins after death They see these methods as encouraging abortion and are morally opposed to it. However, due to These contraceptives are required by law, and failure to comply would result in a $100 fine for Hobby Lobby.

Also Read: Wes Moore Controversy: Wes Moore of Maryland responds to allegations that he failed to clarify his background during interviews

per day employee Hobby Lobby would incur a $475 million annual cost as a result of this. Because it believed that forcing it to cover would be beneficial.Hobby Lobby filed a lawsuit alleging that these four contraceptives violated its religious freedom. Burwell v. Hobby Lobby was a case that made it all the way to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court issued its decision in June 2014.

Hobby Lobby was victorious in a 5-4 decision

The decision was based on the 1993 Act, not the First Amendment. Act to Restore Religious Freedom (RFRA). This act limited the government’s ability to interfere with the economy. Religious practice The Court ruled that the RFRA applied to private, closely held corporations like Hobby. Lobby. It also found these corporations to be “legally capable” of exercising their religion or beliefs.

founders. Furthermore, it determined that the mandate did not meet the “least restrictive need” criteria. require the government to intervene because other options for coverage were available. This sparked a heated debate among the general public. Hillary Clinton called the Supreme Court decision “deeply troubling.” disturbing,” and opponents of the ruling argue that it gives companies like Hobby Lobby the option of denying coverage.

Hobby Lobby Controversy

whenever the company claims that it would violate its belief system They also see this as a clear opportunity for getting around the law Opponents argue that because the Affordable Care Act is a federal law, businesses must comply. comply with all aspects of the law—even those with which owners and employees may disagree. Finally, because the company is for-profit and employs people from a variety of backgrounds and cultures,

religions, Hobby Lobby’s ability to deny certain coverage due to its principles may be interpreted as pushing its limits. religious beliefs onto others Hobby Lobby, on the other hand, has supporters. Supporters are quick to point out that Hobby Lobby is not a for-profit organisation. Only those contraceptives thought to be capable of inducing abortion are opposed to coverage. To Interest Lobbying for abortifacients is a highly moral issue that contradicts the company’s core values. Finally, even though a



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Recent Posts